In the courtroom they assume you are the STRAWMAN… Either way you are a fiction, either the plaintiff or the defendant. If you appear as the trust, they assume it’s the trust that you abandoned in the republic and you are the dead entity in dishonor and you have to rebut the assumption. On the public side; Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 33 there is one type of action, a complaint, and an answer or otherwise response.
If the response can include the counter claim based on the same transaction as that in the complaint, you must bring that counterclaim in public or you have waived. Your pleading is a counterclaim requesting the court take notice of the set off to zero the account and send everyone home. If the counterclaim exists it must be bought or it must be waived. You have to bring the mandatory counterclaim to get rid of any controversy. If there is no controversy, there is no jurisdiction to rule judicially and can do no damage. To bring the counterclaim you have to appear as the STRAWMEN, as a plaintiff or defendant. If he comes in as defendant he is the trustee/debtor. If he is the plaintiff he is the creditor beneficiate. Wouldn’t you rather be the box 6 beneficiary than the trustee? You cannot be a claimant unless you are a creditor and have title to something and you have to have title from the republic, because only the government holds title. When you come as the STRAWMAN beneficiary complainant and they presume it to be a corporate debtor, he can never be a complainant.
If he is an appointed agent he could take on the role of the beneficiary in box 5. If the living man bailor, foreign entity, appointed the STRAWMAN to represent the living man in the public, then the STRAWMAN can represent the foreign box 2 trust, as the beneficiary in box 6 in the public trust. If he files on the public side for pleadings he would style as 3rd plaintiff vs. 3rd party defendant. The plaintiff is turned into the public trustee debtor for settlement and closure based on the trust in box 2? They would have jurisdiction over the beneficiary STRAWMAN but he’s not there to represent himself. He is there to represent the foreign claimant. The judge will assume you are the STRAWMAN and the plaintiff has to duty to produce his claim. He is the beneficiary claimant. You the defendant have to prove everything. When you try to prove as the trustee you are trying to prove it out of a hole. You have to prove it as the counterclaim brought by the foreign trust that is not under the jurisdiction of the magistrate except to take judicial notice of the process. You have to give standing for the STRAWMAN to appear which has already been done through the registered filings in the UCC filings.
You will find the whole report here: Beneficiary & Trustee Status in Court Cases (transcribed .pdf)
Copyright © All Rights Reserved